In these widely discussed works, he argued that the strategic importance of information technology in business has diminished as IT has become more commonplace, standardized and cheaper.
The Internet is also making us smart because it provides us with easy access to an ocean of information that was hard to come by in the past. Can the Internet be managed in such a way as to maximize the halo and minimize the horns?
Carr examined a lot of brain research and technology history pointing to a loss of attention span. He argued that the Internet is part of an efficiency-oriented industrial system that makes us value quick takes more than long, deep, thoughtful discourse. And he wrote this article before Twitter had even become a widely-used system.
The focus on Google comes from an evaluation of the Google mission and business model: The faster we surf across the Web—the more links we click and pages we view—the more opportunities Google and other companies gain to collect information about us and to feed us advertisements. Most of the proprietors of the commercial Internet have a financial stake in collecting the crumbs of data we leave behind as we flit from link to link—the more crumbs, the better.
The last thing these companies want is to encourage leisurely reading or slow, concentrated thought. This sort of doom-and-gloom always accompanies new technologies: But an even greater number of benefits Is the internet making us dumber as well, many of them unanticipated.
But there are some features in the Internet as we know it today that make it less inclined to serve our overall interests than it might. Evgeny Morozov explored the implications of this feature in a article in Slate, Warning: This Site Contains Conspiracy Theories.
The article examines three kooky movements built around dubious beliefs: Each of these movements has created a number of online communities in which members trade links, engage in conversations, and indulge shared delusions. This endows them with a aura of respectability, thus leading to more such communities and greater commitment to largely absurd shared beliefs.
He wants Google to curate links: Thus, whenever users are presented with search results that are likely to send them to sites run by pseudoscientists or conspiracy theorists, Google may simply display a huge red banner asking users to exercise caution and check a previously generated list of authoritative resources before making up their minds.
Facebook is harming our democracy, and Mark Zuckerberg needs to do something about it. Lee explores the implications of the twin facts that many people get their news from Facebook and that Facebook organizes our news feeds by popularity.
Too-good-to-check stories gain more traction online than stories that are balanced and thoroughly reported. And often they are bad editorial decisions — steering people to sensational, one-sided, or just plain inaccurate stories. Facebook is the new home for the conspiracy freaks who used to organize around blogs.
Fixing the Clickbait Problem Lee is obviously concerned about the dynamics behind the fringe elements of the Trump movement, but the most extreme Trump supporters are easily outdone by more virulent fraudster-oriented movements. Just as Morozov suggests that Google curate search results, Lee would like Facebook to step up to its editorial obligations by curating news feeds and even re-writing headlines.
Perhaps a more productive approach to the bias of Google and Facebook is to be found on the end-user side. We could develop browser and social media plugins that fact check articles or specific claims. And if Snopes is not your fact-checker of choice, there are other sources, especially for political stories.
Google and Facebook probably should add fact-checking as a service prominently available to their users. In some sense, clickbait appeals to our innate longing for membership in social groups, a desire that can sometimes overwhelm our other priorities.
Sharing a mythical belief held by a minority — the hallmark of conspiracy cults — has more value to many than mere truth. A study published last year by researchers at the IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, in Italy, found that homogeneous online networks help conspiracy theories persist and grow online.
There are plenty of counter-factual reports in the New York Times, most recently a breathless complaint about genetically engineered seed that managed to turn the key facts on their heads.
At the end of a campaign that dominated the news for months, it was suddenly obvious that the winning side had no plan for how or when the UK would leave the EU — while the deceptive claims that carried the leave campaign to victory suddenly crumbled. A few hours later, the Tory MEP Daniel Hannan stated that immigration was not likely to be reduced — another key claim.
The Fact-Checker Ethic Has Failed At the dawn of blogging, Ken Layne famously said that bloggers could become the antidotes to bias, laziness, and conformity of the mainstream media by fact-checking: It is not difficult to Find You Out, dig?
We could, for example, create a layer to the Internet that uses AI to validate the claims made in science, policy, and politics.
Even if the results are equivocal, it would be nice to know when writers are taking well-defined stands in long-running debates. The question for the next few years is how to monetize higher-quality writing, videos, VR experiences, etc.But for individuals, the implications are less positive. Social networking probably isn’t making you smarter.
In fact, it could be making you dumber by supplying answers and insights without. The caviar of low-brow, gross-out comedy. Read Common Sense Media's Dumb and Dumber review, age rating, and parents guide. President Donald Trump blasted Amazon again on Friday.
He has been waging a yearlong war against the company. Now the question is whether he'll take substantial action against the internet giant.
The problem with the Internet is not the Internet, the problem with the Internet is people. There's a point in the book where a leader gives this speech, and a whole crowd is listening.
They all take a different point of view, and all . Sep 12, · Are smartphones making us dumb? This modern dread – that chronic distraction from all our e-gizmos is mangling our focus, maybe permanently – has .
Nov 28, · And it’s simply not true that the Internet has caused us to be unable to handle longer forms of information and entertainment.
Whatever you may think of Lost, or 24, or Homeland, the fact.